ERSI

 
 

      
Recent mapping technology advances such as direct digital imagery acquisition and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived data sets are quickly changing the remote sensing industry’s service offerings. In fact, the two technologies have begun converging into a single acquisition and georeferenced platform, enabling faster data collection and processing.
In 2004, Sanborn began testing and implementing digital production processes using Vexcel Corp.’s UltraCam-D digital camera. By combining the camera’s multi-spectral capabilities with LiDAR sensor technology, the company has dramatically improved its ability to provide geographic information system (GIS) professionals with robust, inexpensive data sets.



Applying the Technologies
In June 2004, the Wyoming Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) partnered with several local government groups and contracted Sanborn to complete multiple LiDAR and imagery flights across the central and north-central portions of the state. The project’s end products included the development of filtered, classified and “bald earth” LiDAR data sets; multispectral orthophotos; and 2-foot contours.


Says Wyoming NRCS’ Randy Wiggins, “NRCS and its partners are exploiting the data for the traditional uses we expected. But as we continue to work with and understand the significance of the data sets provided by Sanborn, we’re discovering many new applications that will benefit our organization and others. The advantages of direct digital imagery acquisition and LiDAR-derived datsets, compared to analog photogrammetry, are becoming apparent to us.”

 
  Direct Digital Imagery Acquisition
Although small- and medium-format digital cameras have been used for several years, the new large-format sensors produced by companies such as Intergraph Z/I Imaging, Leica Geosystems and Vexcel offer a faster, better solution to conventional film-based aerial imaging.
 

Image Clarity: Radiometric clarity is the most evident advantage that digital sensors have over analog technology. For example, the Vexcel UltraCam-D offers a base panchromatic (black and white) resolution of 11,500 x 7,500 pixels, along with four color channels—red, green, blue (RGB) and near-infrared. Forward-motion compensation can support pixels as small as three centimeters on the ground. In addition, digital images don’t contain analog anomalies such as scratches, lint, dust or grain-noise. Finally, a digitally acquired image simply looks better than an analog scanned image.


Multispectral Data: The second greatest advantage of using a digital sensor instead of analog technology is the multispectral content. The ability to provide clients panchromatic, color (RGB) and color infrared (CIR) in a single flight is significant. With an analog camera, three separate flights over the project area are needed to provide equivalent image products. Typically, the additional flights would be cost prohibitive, so many clients haven’t recognized the benefits of multispectral data sets for sophisticated remote sensing applications such as land use/land classification identification, irrigated land delineation, impervious surface identification, vegetation delineation and wildfire hazard assessment. As the digital revolution continues to expand, more GIS professionals will begin tapping into multispectral-derived GIS data layers.
As part of the NRCS project, Wyoming’s Casper Mountain area was flown with Sanborn’s UltraCam-D multispectral sensor. Stereo models were used for breakline enhancements via stereo compilation. In addition, the multispectral data will enable wild fire hazard assessment professionals to derive land use/land classifications and diseased trees calculations to help identify fire risk areas.

Dynamic Range: Digital sensor technology acquires data at a 12-bit sample rate. Traditional analog collection and subsequent scanning result in a digital image less than 8 bits. The difference is significant for automatic image processing techniques. For example, the increased data range allows for greater accuracy and redundancy when completing processes such as auto-match aerial triangulation, auto-correlated digital elevation model (DEM) extraction and auto-seaming for orthophoto mosaics. The superior 12-bit image quality and greater accuracy of automated techniques lead to schedule and cost efficiencies.


In addition, the dynamic range allows greater detail in shadow areas, such as those in rugged terrain or dense urban settings. As with many western states, Wyoming exhibits challenges due to terrain relief. NRCS has seen significant benefits due to shadow reduction in mountainous and canyon areas.

No Film, Film Processing or Scanning: Digital technology eliminates film processing and scanning, allowing for a much faster turnaround/delivery schedule. Moreover, direct digital acquisition permits the collection of 90 percent forward lap between exposures within a flight line. This is a significant benefit when considering that the 90 percent forward lap allows up to nine different views of the same feature. Also, additional overlap is needed to guarantee appropriate coverage and reduced building lean when traditional analog photography is flown in urban and mountainous terrain. Any time more photography is captured, cost for film, film processing and scanning increases. The cost to increase overlap is minimal if direct digital acquisition is completed.
 

 
  LiDAR Surface Mapping
LiDAR systems measure the time of flight of a laser pulse to construct a surface elevation model. The two most prevalent commercial systems are produced by Leica Geosystems (the ALS series) and Optech (the ALTM series). Both systems operate on the principle of reflecting a pulsed laser off an oscillating mirror and measuring the time of flight to determine the distance traveled by the laser pulse. An integrated 6-DOF geopositioning system (both companies use the Applanix POS AV) determines the sensor’s precise position (x, y, z) and attitude. This information, combined with the angle of the mirror, is used to calculate 3-D positions of terrain points. Such capabilities offered NRCS several advantages

Efficiency Improvements: Most mapping companies currently use LiDAR for contour and orthophoto mapping, as LiDAR is more efficient than traditional stereo compilation. A stereo compiler typically collects 1,400 points an hour, but LiDAR can collect 100,000 points per second! Thus, clients receive mapping products faster and cheaper. In addition, LiDAR data provide a greater amount of information than traditional stereo-compiled products. As a result, NRCS received greater accuracy and more data sets at a lower cost when compared with analog photogrammetry.

Speed: LiDAR technology offers fast, near-real-time collection of 3-D points that are typically used to generate digital terrain models (DTMs). LiDAR doesn’t discriminate, collecting features such as trees, cars and buildings, as well as the ground. The entire data set is known as a “point cloud.” Automatic algorithms can remove surface classes such as vegetation, power lines, buildings and automobiles. Once removed, the processed LiDAR data set is known as a “bald earth” DEM, which is used for orthorectification and contour creation.

3-D Analysis: Analyzing data in 3-D helps users visualize spatial relationships for sound decision-making, and facilitates effective and clear communication of planning ideas. The NRCS project included LiDAR collections for several canyon corridors, the city of Kaycee and Casper Mountain. LiDAR-derived DEMs, surface classifications and intensity image data sets were created. Furthermore, canopy density and tree outlines were derived from the LiDAR data and delivered in vector format. Compared with public-domain U.S. Geological Survey DEMs, the more accurate LiDAR-derived DEMs made it much easier for NRCS to complete hydrographic and hydraulic modeling and dam breach analysis.

Contour Mapping: As part of the NRCS project, Sanborn colleted LiDAR and Vexcel UltraCam-D imagery to produce 2-foot contours meeting Federal Emergency Management Agency accuracy specifications. NRCS used elevation data sets and a 3-D visualization tool from the Orton Family Foundation’s CommunityViz software to re-create a major 2002 flood in Kaycee.


For many applications, LiDAR is an ideal tool. However, certain applications, such as floodplain mapping or 2-foot contour mapping, require guaranteed accuracy. For these applications, raw or filtered LiDAR data often are unsuitable because automatic filtering to remove buildings and vegetation is imperfect. Overly aggressive filtering will remove important topographic features, such as hilltops. Conversely, some vegetation and large buildings aren’t removed if the filtering isn’t aggressive enough. Other problems arise when the terrain surface is under-sampled. In other words, LiDAR has finite point spacing, and it doesn’t capture sharp terrain breaks precisely. LiDAR doesn’t penetrate thick vegetation, which typically occurs around stream channels. Furthermore, certain types of land cover, such as thick grass in a field, can cause a systematic bias.

 
 

 
  Processed LiDAR contains residual errors, while individual LiDAR points are accurate (15 centi-meters RMSE). As a whole, LiDAR data are “noisy.” For example, a cross-section of LiDAR data in the area of a frozen lake would reveal a horizontal band of points 5-10 centimeters thick. Consequently, contours generated from raw LiDAR data have a ragged appearance and show many tops and isolations that are due more to noise in the LiDAR data than to actual ground features. This problem is also evident in stream beds, because hydrology isn’t enforced. Due to systematic errors and failure to penetrate vegetation near streams, contours generated from LiDAR data can show water flowing uphill. In addition, automatic filtering typically doesn’t cut the terrain to allow water to flow through culverts or low-lying bridges. Again, these are important issues for hydraulic modeling applications.


For the NRCS project, Sanborn used its proprietary Filtering and Surface Estimation (FASE) process to edit the LiDAR data and produce a triangulated irregular network (TIN) surface. Using a sophisticated least-squares surface estimation algorithm, LiDAR points are combined with manually captured breaklines and masspoints, as well as surface classes that identify buildings, water and vegetation


The process is performed iteratively. Stereocompilers examine surface contours using stereo photogrammetric workstations. They modify the surface by adding breaklines and masspoints, as well as defining surface types. The surface is then re-estimated and new contours are generated. This process is repeated until the surface is accurate and complete.
In the image set below, Figures 1a and 2a show a shaded relief model and contours derived from automatically filtered LiDAR data. Figures 1b and 2b show the same area computed and processed with FASE. In Figure 1a, note the contour puddles along the drainage and the “uncut” bridge in the upper part of the image. These examples show the lack of hydro-enforcement and have been corrected with FASE in Figure 1b. Note in Figure 2a how overpasses have been inconsistently handled. Also note the stray contours that extend from the riverbanks into the river, as well as the noise-related contours that are scattered all over the river. FASE corrects these problems, too, as shown in Figure 2b.

 

 
  FASE requires stereo photography in most cases. Although this lengthens the process, it is still less effort than using a traditional photogrammetric approach. In addition, a surface estimated with FASE addresses all the aforementioned deficiencies.  
 

Ground-Based LiDAR: A ground-based LiDAR instrument provides an alternate means of terrain and digital image acquisition. The Trimble GS 200 3-D laser scanner will enhance the end products that have been traditionally delivered to LiDAR and surveying technology users. Civil engineering, architectural and surveying companies rely on the topographic information for various projects such as highway design and bridge repair. A ground-based laser scanner will allow for profiling and measuring of structures that may not be visible from an aerial acquisition method. Furthermore, a ground-based LiDAR sensor provides significantly more detail when compared with traditional ground-survey methods. The Trimble GS200 3-D laser scanner also provides imagery that is co-registered with the LiDAR data for a ground-based orthophoto. The sensor’s accuracy depends on how far it is from the terrain/structure (at 100 meters, the manufacturer claims accuracy is 4mm). Future solutions of the GS 200 3-D LiDAR unit will include the integration of an Inertial Measurement Unit and Global Positioning System (GPS) technologies, enabling the procedures to move from static and stop-and-go acquisition methods to mobile acquisition similar to aerial flight.
 
   
  Unlimited Utility
For years, photogrammetry professionals have incorporated LiDAR into a variety of applications, including volumetric studies, DEM development, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, and topographic and digital orthophoto mapping. Now integrators such as NRCS have shown how LiDAR can be used with a digital multispectral sensor for increasingly diverse applications, including 3-D modeling, dam breach analysis, wildfire hazard assessment, soil type delineation and erosion, tree canopy extraction and density calculations, as well as other surface class extraction such as buildings and power lines. Moreover, habitat mapping will be completed using the vegetation canopy heights and multispectral vegetation classifications.


Such innovative uses of LiDAR and multi-spectral imagery demonstrate how remote sensing and GIS professionals can receive more information faster and at lower cost. The integration of these two technologies and the fusion of their complementary data sets are vital for accurate GIS applications.

 

 
 
  See more Featured Articles
 

  See  Featured Images
 
  Subscribe to Earth Imaging Journal

 
Go to Home Page
      

 

  [none]

Copyright ©2003-2009 Earthwide Communications LLC - Powered by eNetwork Marketing